Author: Rob's Surf Report

Rob lives near the geographical center of the North American continent with his wife, daughters, and one very needy cat. Most days he's a member of the law enforcement community, and tries to keep himself sane by making himself both stronger and more creative. His big plan is to find a way back to the coast and to stay there for good so he can surf the livelong day.

>Household Finance, Part II: The Ledger

>When it comes time to balance your checkbook, do you cringe in fear? Does your heart fall into your lap when you pull a folded, crumpled wad of receipts out of your wallet or purse and realize ‘oh no, what do I do with all of this?’ In this second part of a two-part series on accounting and finance at the household level, I’ll explain both the old-fashioned and the newfangled ways of balancing your checking account, as well as the methods I use for hiding money within the ledger itself for a more transparent way to save and/or cushion your spending habits.

The old-fashioned way:

Type: paper
Difficulty level: 8

Materials required:
A checkbook ledger
One or two highlighter markers
An old-school ball-point pen
Calculator
Every Saturday morning for the rest of your life

Nobody ever said that keeping a ledger was difficult, and the way that we’re traditionally supposed to do it really isn’t so hard (except for those who don’t like to do them.) However, I started the joint checking account with the mindset that I have to do it right or everything is going to tank and I’m going to end up having to fix it. With money. Here’s a page from my old ledger: click it to see the large version.

Photobucket

So, does this look difficult? It might; I admit that every receipt, bill, and transaction that went into this ledger added five minutes to the process. I had to check and re-check every calculation, but this was how I did it. I highlighted the deposits just for visibility, but that’s not the weird thing about this ledger, is it? Take a look at the bills entries and you’ll see where I put my own spin on the process. In Part I of this series I said that the Save for bills amount in the budget is subtracted from the available balance of the account, and this is how I did it. I needed a way to keep our spending (grocery) money separate from our saving (bill) money without using a separate account. This is also how I hid half of my bi-weekly paycheck in my personal ledger.

The first time, I just did a Bills/Bill money out entry, subtracted the bill money, and X’d out the posted column (where you check off when the transaction has posted.) The following week, I brought that money back in with a Bills/Bill money in entry, pay the bills from it, add the current week’s bill money, and then “bill out” the result. The trick to making it easier is in not putting receipts from spending money in between the bill money transactions, and highlighting the bill money transactions so you can easily find them. Here’s the step-by-step process I developed over the first month or so:

  1. enter the spending money receipts
  2. Add in the deposits
  3. “Bill in” the amount billed out the previous week (using the Bills/Bill in entry)
  4. Pay any bills
  5. Get your calculator ready
  6. Take your billed in amount, subtract the bills you just paid, and add in the amount you are saving for bills this week. The resulting number – which is hopefully a positive one – is the amount you “bill out” (using the Bills/Bill out entry.)

If the bill out amount is a negative number and you did everything right, then you should know why it’s negative and it shouldn’t be a problem – if you’re running a surplus, then you should have some cushion for that, and it will fix itself the following week. At least, that’s how it worked out for me the one time it happened in the past year. If you don’t have a surplus cushion, then call someone and tell them you have to pay your bill late, and don’t be afraid to admit that your budget went wonky; companies appreciate it when you let them know in advance that you can’t pay on time.


The newfangled way:

Type: spreadsheet
Difficulty level: 5

Materials required:
A computer
Microsoft Excel, OpenOffice Calc, or some other spreadsheet program
A few minutes here and there, maybe twenty minutes once or twice a month.

There’s a safe feeling to having your ledger on paper, until you realize that you’re holding on to an anachronism. For one thing, most – if not all – banks keep track of your account and give you online access to your transactions, statements, and everything else. This is how I would balance out the ledger. For another thing, if you have a computer and can use a spreadsheet, you can make a new kind of ledger that is much more flexible and accessible, and that is self-calculating. (Again, clicking the picture makes it easier to examine.)

  Photobucket

 I should have mentioned in the previous post that when I make a spreadsheet that will eventually have more than twenty rows to it (like a yearly ledger) I freeze the sheet headers. To do this in Excel you highlight the row below where you want the split to be, go to the Window menu and click Freeze. Then, when you scroll down the sheet, the headers stay at the top. Don’t use the Split option; that will take care of itself. What you see in the new ledger looks a little more complex, but it’s really much more organized and simpler to use once you understand the layout. It’s laid out in three sections: Transactions, Allocations, and Balances.

Transactions:
This section should look like part of your ledger, literally. I began using spreadsheets for my ledgers just this past month, so it’s new. Since then, I’ve had to add columns for the date and posting status of transactions in this section, so my actual ledger template looks a little different now. It’s self-explanatory, and the amounts in this section are actual transaction amounts.

Allocations:
This is where all the action is. I’ve created three separate allocation accounts within the account itself using a single spreadsheet. Does that sound weird? It’s no different than partitioning your hard drive, really; these are virtual account partitions. I have, from left to right, the Available Balance (AB), the Bills Balance (BB), and the Savings Balance (SB). AB is for grocery money, BB is for bills (of course,) and SB is for the surplus and savings. Doing it this way has some advantages:

  • I can split up transactions in a single line, which cuts down on entries.
  • I can see all three balances at once – no need to search and interpret a paper ledger.
  • This method obsoletes the surplus breakdown box in the budget sheet – now we can see the changes on a transactional basis, and we don’t need to spend time figuring out where the surplus came from.
  • Technically, I’m no longer hiding money; now I’m allocating it.

The three columns in this section headed “XX Amount” are where I enter amounts for something. Most of the entries come out of the grocery money (AB), because they’re for groceries. Nothing comes out of SB because we’re saving it. The bills make it interesting, though. I mentioned in the last post that I over-allocate for bills by taking what I expect it to be and rounding it up to the nearest dollar (or some reasonable amount, like the next nearest five dollars for the water bill.) This means I have saved more money than I’m going to spend on bills, and of course I put the extra bits into SB. So where bills are paid, as you can see, I withdraw the entire allocation for that bill from the BB and credit the extra into SB in a single line. Likewise, when I add in budget contribution deposits, I split them into all three balances accordingly (note the last entry.)

 The three balance columns in this section are calculated with formulas. It’s a simple =X15-W16 type of formula that takes the previous balance and subtracts the amount I’ve entered on the current line. I fill down these three columns (highlight some cells, including the last one with the formula in it; Edit/Fill/Down) as the sheet progresses.

Balances:
The last section of the ledger contains balances, and should never have to be touched once it’s set up. This section serves two functions:

  1. It allows me to see the account balance as it will appear on my bank’s web site, and
  2. It allows me to visually verify the amount of the transaction without having to check and re-check on a calculator.

Both columns are formulated and filled down as the sheet progresses. The Amount column is the sum of the three XX Amount columns that are hand-filled in the Allocations section with a formula that looks like =G50+J50+M50 at line 50. This column’s sole purpose is to provide verification that the amount I’ve allocated is the actual amount of the transaction (which I would have hand-filled in the Transactions section.) If I visually compare the two amount columns, this prevents me from making accounting mistakes. The Gross Balance column, on the other hand, is the sum of the three balance columns in the Allocations section with a formula that looks like =H50+K50+N50 at line 50. This line reflects the account’s actual balance.

The spreadsheet ledger has proven to save me time and effort, while allowing me a better way to allocate our money and track the balances of those allocations. All in all, I like it much better than keeping the paper ledger, plus making corrections aren’t a headache. The use of a spreadsheet also makes the budget and ledgers accessible; I synchronize those sheets with an online storage account so that I can access them anywhere, including on my iPad and my Android phone. When Karisa texts me to ask how much we have left for groceries, I can check it and give her an exact amount. Plus, I can enter receipts on the go without having to keep the checkbooks with us, which will make our trip to Detroit this Summer much easier to manage.

If you have any questions or comments, feel free to do so by adding a comment. Thanks for reading!

>Household Finance, part I: The Budget

>Let’s face it: one of the most important things we can do to ensure that we’re running a successful household is making a budget. Whether we own our home or are renting a home, flat, or apartment, keeping track of the bills and making sure that we are setting aside enough money to pay them is a skill that goes a long way toward giving us peace of mind. This is part one of a two-part series about the way I handle accounting and finance on the household level.

Before:
Karisa and I used to pay things out of pocket, splitting the bill and getting it paid on time. This was a drag, because I would put the bill on my desk and then remind her that I need the money for the bills on payday; then I’d have to deposit the money so I could write a check. There would be weeks when we had no money because the Internet bill and the phone bill were due at the same time, we had to buy groceries, cat food, and cat litter, fuel for our car, and then we were wiped clean out.

One day, I proposed that we make a budget. This was an idea that Karisa had brought up before, but I had to get an idea of how I would do it in my mind. I sat down and drew it all up on a piece of paper, with a calculator, and showed her what I had come up with. The plan looked good to her: each week, both of us would put in a set amount of money to the joint checking account; the bills would be paid on time, and there was money set aside for groceries.
I ran the budget for about six months on paper before I sat down on a Saturday morning and made a spreadsheet template (mainly so that I wouldn’t have to spend half an hour setting up the paper sheet anymore, but also to save the planet.) This is what it looks like (click it to see it bigger):

Photobucket

I love using spreadsheets for this purpose, primarily because you can have it calculate your budget for you; all you have to do is enter numbers. I’ve gotten to the point where I can make six months of budgets in advance, giving them the rare tweak if necessary. This is the layout I use:

The top portion:

The top portion is for essential data. It takes into consideration paydays, expenses; and money coming into and leaving the budget. Some of this information is now what I would call “legacy” – a euphemism for “possibly unnecessary to my strategy at this time,” but I like to stick with what works until I’m sure. Here’s a section-by-section breakdown from left to right:

Paydays: I originally did this because I would put in two weeks’ contribution at a time because my pay comes every other week. Eventually I developed a way around this that involves hiding half of my pay in my checking ledger (you’ll hear more about this strategy in the next part of this series) so that I can contribute on a weekly basis. This has since made things much easier, and the paydays section is like an arcane law that nobody realizes is still on the books. Eventually I’ll take it out, but I just haven’t yet because I use it to fill in the dates on the weeks sections. Isn’t that a weak excuse?

Expenses: We originally used all three lines in this section, but now we have two cars and so we each pay for our own gas. The “Other” line was one I put in for cigarettes because we used to share packs, but we both quit last year, so I left it in just in case we need to budget something in on a short-term basis. These three lines are formulated into the “Each pays” and “Save for bills” lines in the weekly sections in the bottom portion of the sheet.

Bills: This is where I document allocations for bills. I usually take the bill from the previous month, round it up to the nearest dollar, and put the amount in the appropriate box. The due days are the same from month to month, so they’re in the template. Obviously, this works best if the bills don’t fluctuate too wildly; but if you allow for a surplus cushion, the practice of allocating the amount from the previous month’s bill should help offset any modest, unexpected overages. When the bill goes back to normal the next month (hopefully) you will be able to reclaim the lost surplus from the over-allocation of the bill. Trust me, it works.

Budgetary input: This is important. When you have bills due in the middle of the month, but you do your budget a month at a time, you might have money leaving the previous month’s budget and coming into the current month’s budget to pay for those bills. For us, the three bills shown all carry over, and so require special treatment in the weekly sections in the bottom portion of the sheet. This is also where I keep track of the budget surplus and it’s growth or shrinkage from the previous month (this might change soon, as I have designed a new expanded account ledger to take over this function). The “Total in:” line below the box calculates the four amounts lined up above it with a simple =SUM(M4:M7) equation.

Budgetary output: This is the yang to the input’s yin. Obviously, it’s the money leaving the budget to go to the next month’s budget. I don’t fill in the surplus until the end of the month because honestly, I don’t know how much it is until after the last Friday of the month. Again, the total line under the box is a =SUM(R4:R7) calculation of the four lines above. The numbers in the box get entered into the input box of the next month’s budget.

The bottom portion:

The bottom portion is where I calculate the allocation of each week’s contributions and keep pertinent notes. Here, the devil is in the details; that’s the reason I chose to switch to a spreadsheet – to reduce the possibility of human error – but it doesn’t mean one shouldn’t double- and triple-check the budget before using it.

The weekly sections:
Depending on the month, there will be four or five weeks ending in Friday. Because my wife gets paid weekly, I opt to do the budget on a weekly basis. If I were single, I could reasonably switch this budget to a two- or three-week budget because that’s how many times I get paid in a month. But if I were to ask my wife for three or four hundred dollars every other week, she would end up miserable and then so would I. So, needless to say, it’s better to tailor the budget to the highest pay frequency in the household. One solution, like I mentioned in the Paydays section, is to have the person with the lower pay frequency pay in multiple weekly contributions (because that makes sense). I found a more elegant solution, but it might just work for me because it’s my pay and I take care of the budget, too. Either way, there has to be a lowest common denominator for making contributions to the budget, and the easiest time for a person to part with a chunk of their loot is on payday.

When I set up the budget, I fill in all the values for the bills that are lined up under the date (each date being a Friday of the month.) There was, originally, a reason for the break in the bills section. it was intended that bills that were accounted for only within the month itself were in the top group and bills that had money rolling in from the previous month were in the bottom group, but when I added in Hulu Plus in November I accidentally stuck it in the bottom portion and haven’t fixed it yet. I calculate each week’s contribution for all of the bills in the top group (and Hulu Plus) by taking the allocation amount in the Bills section and dividing it by the number of budget weeks in the month (in the illustration’s case, that’s four.) This way, the bill is saved for throughout the month. I fill in the values myself, because it’s pointless to put in formulas when the number of weeks can change from one month to the next. The bills in the bottom group (except for Hulu Plus) get calculated like this:

(Allocation – (budgetary input amount)) / (number of weeks until the bill is paid)

Take Verizon, for example.

($195 – $48.75)/3 = $48.75

It makes sense, because I calculated the amount that I would need from one due date to the next on a weekly basis in the previous month (this is why I now do several months at a time – because it’s a flow.) So you can reasonably assume that I only paid in one week on the previous month. But don’t take this for granted by just using that number again – always re-calculate when making the next budget. Then check it, and check it again.

The column of bills in each weekly section (or each period) is formulated with the grocery money from the Expenses section in two amounts that are crucial to the budget:

Each pays: This is self-explanatory. My wife and I both deposit at least this amount into the joint checking account every Friday. This is the exact formula I use: =(SUM(B17:B20)+SUM(B22:B25)+SUM(E4:E6))/2

Essentially, the sum of the top group of bills plus the sum of the bottom group of bills, plus the sum of the expenses column in the top section, split in half. We can see, this is why Excel rocks the block.

Save for bills: This tells me how much money to set aside for bills, two methods for which will be explored in the next part of this series. This is the formula: =SUM(B17:B20)+SUM(B22:B25)

Take note that this is actually a portion of the formula used to calculate the weekly contribution amount; it’s just the sum of the bill allocations for the period.

At the end of each week, I balance the joint checking ledger and the Save for bills amount is essentially subtracted from the available balance of the account (again, this will be explained in greater detail in the next post) along with money that’s already out – so we can’t spend it by accident. And actually, when it’s not shown in your ledger’s available balance, it’s harder to spend it on purpose, too. I pay any bills (mostly online) out of our checking account’s bills balance, and I mark them as paid on the sheet. Then I write “Completed” and the date underneath the column for my own reference, so that I can see that I’ve finished dealing with the weekly budget.

A word on format: Like I’ve said, every month can have four or five weeks, or if you get paid every other week, it’s two or three. I use a single template that I designed for the budget sheet that has five weeks on it. When I start a new month, I fill in headings and rote amounts, but I also have to re-arrange the bottom section based on two things: 1) how many periods there are this month, and 2) when the bills are due. I first take out the last week in the template (by clearing the contents of the cells) if necessary, and then arrange the weeks so that there is a space (not counting the very small columns) after a week where one or more bills are due, so that I can write “PAY” in the space after that bill, after that week. After I have paid the bill, I change it to “PAID” so that I know. It’s good to keep track of these things. When I have to move these things, I move one column at a time so that nothing disappears in one of the very small columns. Any modern version of Excel or OpenOffice Calc will change the formulas so they still work, which is another reason why Excel kicks butt. It’s almost effortless.

The notes section:
In the notes section, I keep track of three things: when our car insurance is up for renewal (because we used to pay it month-to-month, but we decided to pay the whole premium for the discount,) the differences between what I’ve allocated for a bill and what we actually pay for that bill, and any extra money we have from the grocery money at the end of the week. I absorb all these amounts into the budget surplus, which is just good budgeting. We’re actually trying to work up to a $3,000 surplus so that if anything goes catastrophically wrong, we can have a two-month cushion to keep us from going insane. While it’s true that I could simply absorb these things as I go and calculate the surplus at the end of the month by subtraction (as the box in the top section does) – and indeed I did this for the better part of a year – I decided to start keeping track of where every penny comes from.

This is also good budgeting. This way, if the surplus goes down and someone gets unhappy about that, you can show them which bill wasn’t allocated properly for because – I don’t know – someone kept leaving the hose on all night or something. That’s just an example, it doesn’t actually happen to us. If you keep track well enough, the amounts should balance out perfectly with the amount of change in the budget surplus in the budgetary output box.

At the bottom of the sheet, I keep other notes as necessary. My wife’s hospital bill actually comes out of her money, but having it in it’s own place on the sheet reminds us to pay it every month. The surplus growth goal was my wanting to get back where we were the day we moved into our house in December, because we lost surplus when we had the Internet installed, and – I don’t know, something else threw us off track. We had that cushion, and that was nice. But you have to try to build it up when you’re not using it, too!

After:
Karisa and I know what to expect. Rather than living from check to check, our bills are paid on time with almost no effort and so we can forget about it and focus our energy on more important things, like helping Niko in his search for a better mousetrap (I tried to uncover the flaw in his thinking, but he just doesn’t seem to understand that you have to have mice to trap.) What’s more, we have money to fall back on, and we’re building a nest egg. Wins all around.

Looking ahead: in the other part of this series, I’ll discuss my previous method for “hiding” funds from the available balance in our joint checking ledger, and my new spreadsheet-based method for allocating funds rather than hiding them. We’ll learn how to use these methods of organization and record-keeping to build financial discipline in ourselves and to make our budgets successful.

>Rob’s Surf Report is now on Android!

>Last night, I ran across this post in the Lifehacker feed in my browser’s sidebar. After scanning over it, I thought that if I could make an Android app for my blog, then people could read my blog on their Android phones! In what may someday be deemed an unnecessary move, I stayed up until 1:30 in the morning working on it, tweaking the settings and whipping up graphics in the GIMP. I’m happy with the preliminary results: get the Rob’s Surf Report app v1.0.4 here.

I’m thinking about making a download button for the sidebar here, and I have to figure out how to change the favicon here to the new surfboard icon I found for the app. I believe that if I have a button, then I can keep the app current on that, and have the version number listed by the button so that people can see if they have the most current version or not.

If you have comments, questions, concerns, doomsday prophecies, whatever – leave them where I can find them!

>Spring meltdown sprung a leak in my basement!

>So today we had an interesting development; after I had taken a shower and we had washed some sheets, I went down to the laundry room to do . . . something, I don’t remember. I walk in, and there’s all this water on the floor over the drain! We had gotten a leak on one wall that had meandered to the drain, and so I thought of this, but there was just too much water there. I got an allen wrench and used it to pop off the drain cover, hoping all the water would just disappear like that. No luck.

So, Karisa and I went to the store to get a plunger to see if I could just plunge it. The fact that we didn’t even have a plunger was enough to send me to the store for one, but my rationale was that the spring meltdown had filled the storm drains to the point where water was coming up through our drain, which would mean it was just melt water, which I was okay with. Sewage . . . not so much.

When we got back, there was even more water, accompanied by a light odor of sewage. I know we weren’t running any water, so while Karisa got on her houndstooth rubber boots and started a-plungin’, I got on the horn with Roto-Rooter. I am not a plumber. The guy came over, and we chatted about how very little I actually know about our new home. I knew that there was supposed to be a valve to prevent this from happening, but why it wasn’t working? I don’t know.

About four hours later, it was taken care of, and I’m a little poorer but quite satisfied. The city had to come and clean a clog out of their sewer, which was backed up about 3/4 up the manhole (which should normally be clear to the bottom.) The Rooter guy said, “considering how backed up that thing was, I am shocked that you are the only one that called me.” I had to pay him for running the camera line, which cost twice as much as I was hoping. But I think the money I spent taught me a few valuable things about my new home:

1. My home’s output is coupled to the neighbor’s before hitting the sewer, because that’s how they roll around here. Fine.

2. When the water is that backed up in the sewer, I now know that my backflow valve is not going to be sufficient to stop all of the water. But had that valve not been in place, it would have backed up a couple of feet of sewage, ruining half a dozen guitars, two amplifiers, my exercise bike, furniture, laundry machines, walls, catbox, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

3. I could have gotten this taken care of for free had I called the city, but instead I got on the Internet and read all these stories about how people called the city, the city came and said they were all clear. This was usually followed by a charming anecdote about how they have to snake their drains for tree roots every year. I should have known better, since the pipe leading to the street is practically brand new, and I knew that. Lesson learned, go for the free thing first, because it’s not going to stop the neighbor from flushing their toilet!

4. A quick way to keep sewage from coming out of the drain when it starts backing up is to shove a wadded rag down it with the plunger handle (be sure to leave a bit you can grab when it’s all done.) This won’t stop water from coming up, but if the pressure isn’t too high, the real filth will stay trapped under the rag.

5. The clean-out for the sewer is outside, in the neighbor’s yard (because they’re on the high side, I think.)

To top it all off, our five month-old puppy who never goes #2 in the house has done so twice today, both times not very long after having been outside. Karisa was kind enough to wash down and bleach the laundry room floor after the plumber left, but maybe Lex is getting the olfactory impression that the neighborhood has left their mark upon his territory.

>Recycling to Reduce: Bismarck’s Options to Save Landfill Space

>     Over the past decade, Bismarck has made significant advances in energy efficiency: we use wood waste to heat public works facilities that process waste; the airport uses a geothermal system; and waste water is converted into natural gas and fertilizer. The natural gas is reused in the process, while the fertilizer is used on crop land for a ten-mile radius around the city (Eckroth, City officials). There is, however, one major item that remains to be resolved, and that separates Bismarck from other major cities in the nation: landfill sustainability. The Bismarck landfill is a finite space for storing all of our household waste – the constant flow of garbage that urban planners refer to as the “municipal solid waste” (MSW) stream. Considering the rise in the city’s population over the past few years due to economy-driven migration, and Bismarck’s willingness to contract waste containment for outlying towns such as Linton, the size of our landfill is a matter that should be given every consideration. The problem with the landfill is that if it becomes full, the city will have to expand it, or find a location to create a second landfill; either of these solutions would be an unnecessary waste of land and taxpayers’ money, and nobody wants a new garbage dump in their backyard. This means that siting and building a new dump takes years, sometimes more than a decade, as people fight it tooth and nail.

     The ideal solution is to enact more legislation and programs that not only reduce the volume of refuse in the landfill, but to prevent that trash from going there in the first place. That way, in the face of growing demand, we can keep the landfill at lower than full capacity for decades to come. We need to ensure that the Bismarck landfill remains our sole garbage dump, and this can be accomplished through the joint use of curbside recycling and volume-based garbage collection fees, and by examining the possibility of expanding the recycling capabilities that are currently available to all of North Dakota.

     Bismarck already has a recycling solution in effect; there are eighteen recycling trailers placed throughout the city where people can take their recyclables, and twenty-two yard waste collection trailers where people can get rid of their grass clippings, leaves, and garden trimmings. According to the City of Bismarck’s 2010 Recycling Trailer Map, “[i]tems that may be recycled are aluminum beverage cans and tin cans, corrugated cardboard . . . newspapers, telephone books and plastics. Plastics that will be accepted include plastics that have the recycling symbol #1 thru #7.” (1) The biggest problem with this is that the recycling trailers represent a passive solution. Residents must go to the nearest trailer, which may be quite far from their homes, in order to recycle. For some residents who do not own a vehicle or are unable to drive, the farther away the trailer is, the less likely it is that they will take the effort to recycle, especially in the winter. Some residents will not want to take the extra time to make a trip to the recycling trailer and will throw everything away instead.

     The method of collection that people find most convenient is curbside recycling, which is not a new concept for Bismarck. The city tried a test program for curbside recycling in the 1990s on one-third of the city, and at the end of the test they decided to use the recycling trailers instead; at the time, the amount of recyclable material being collected was too low to warrant the cost of curbside recycling. About fifteen years later, Jeff Heintz, the Director of Service Operations for Bismarck, says that “a survey [conducted in January of 2010] showed that less than half the people recycle.” (Eckroth, Relooking) He also says “that by creating a curb-side recycling program, the city could increase the practice by 40 percent. In four years, it may leave 1.2 million more cubic square feet of air space in our landfill.” (Eckroth, City wants) An immediate start in curbside recycling could cut down considerably on a household’s garbage output, as plastic and metal containers move from the trash can to the recycle bin, along with newspapers, magazines, and cardboard.

     The city of Grand Forks has a curbside recycling, a program that was enacted while they were trying to find a site for a second landfill, as theirs was nearing maximum capacity. In a 2008 letter to the Bismarck Tribune’s editor, executive director of the North Dakota Solid Waste and Recycling Association Angela Boeshans writes, “[t]he city of Grand Forks has been trying to locate and build a new landfill for more than 12 years” (Boeshans). In 2005, the Associated Press indicates that Grand Forks’ curbside recycling program was beginning to see “an increase in the number of residents who [were] recycling” (Grand Forks). Grand Forks’ curbside recycling program is currently contracted through Waste Management. According to Waste Management’s website, they use “the latest sorting technologies . . . [including] single-stream recycling, which allows . . . residents to put all their recyclables into one bin. These programs can help increase recycling participation by as much as 30%” (Waste management). The best way for Bismarck to implement curbside recycling would be to contract it through Waste Management, paying one bill and letting them sort out the cost components.

     The reduction in the volume of garbage produced by a household through recycling becomes instrumental in the “pay-as-you-throw” (PAYT) program. This is a volume-based pricing option that would distribute garbage collection fees more fairly among households. In PAYT, the city would allow each household to select one of three sizes of garbage bins, based on the amount of trash they think they will put out each week, and the cost of their garbage collection will be based upon the size of that bin – i.e., the smallest bin has the lowest cost associated with it, and the largest bin carries the highest cost; there would be the option to switch sizes, if a family’s needs change. If a household needs to get rid of more garbage than they can fit into their can in a week, that garbage would have to be marked with a special tag that would cost a few dollars; this tag tells the garbage men that the trash collection for that bag has been paid for and they can take it away. Rather than being like a tax, this option brings the pricing method for garbage collection more in line with other consumer services that are less transparent, such as wireless telephone service; we pay for a limited amount of service (in this case, garbage collection,) and if we need more, then we must pay extra for it.

     PAYT is not a new concept; according to the Associated Press, “[f]our North Dakota cities – Devils Lake, Drayton, Pembina and Wahpeton – have volume-based garbage fees. Fargo is preparing to switch to a volume-based fee system, also known as pay-as-you-throw” (State’s Goal). The PAYT program, if implemented alongside curbside recycling, would be a viable incentive for families to both cut down on their household waste and encourage recycling to reduce costs; these are the major factors in keeping the Bismarck landfill’s growth rate sustainable. In a survey conducted early this year by the Bismarck City Commission, little more than a third of the households whose surveys were returned opposed the idea of curbside recycling. Less than a third – twenty-nine percent – didn’t know what a “pay as you throw” program was. “[T]he survey’s comment section was popular. Many felt the capital city should lead by example and use the system . . . others felt the tags would be confusing and inconvenient.” (Eckroth, Bismarck) While getting used to a new system can undoubtedly be confusing and inconvenient for some who have become comfortable with the existing system, it appears as though the majority of Bismarck’s population is ready to assist the city in making it a greener place.

     What happens to the bottles and cans that come out of our trash? They aren’t magically converted into new goods, or reused as they are; the plastic is separated by type and shredded, while the steel and aluminum cans are destined to be melted down and shaped into raw metal stock. Old paper and cardboard get turned into new paper and cardboard. There is a market for recyclable materials – a way for the city to sell them; this brings up the subject of cost, because nothing is free.

     “The city’s passive recycling program now generates about $138,000 a year from reusable products. Cost of operating recycle trailers and dumpsters is $265,000” (Eckroth, City wants). In other words, the city recovers over half of the money spent to maintain the recycling program currently in place; an expanded program will certainly change that balance, but we must also consider the money that is saved through waste management. How much has the city saved via the airport’s geothermal system, the natural gas reclaimed from raw sewage, and the wood waste used to heat the waste processing facilities? While it costs money to recycle, a majority of that cost can be offset by both selling the byproducts of waste reclamation and recycling, and by using money-saving green technologies that not only help us save money and energy, but also help keep our landscape beautiful.

     If there is an element of Bismarck’s fledgling recycling program that comes close to being as inconvenient as the lack of curbside pickup, it is the amount of material that is yet unable to be recycled. These items include paper cartons and glass containers, which must be thrown away if there is no other use for them. They represent a significant portion of the MSW stream; in order to further reduce the volume of landfilled waste, these options will have to be seriously considered.

     Paper cartons – not counting those made of corrugated cardboard, which are already recyclable if not contaminated with grease – represent a significant volume, if not a significant mass, of household waste. In fact, to call the contribution paper cartons make to the MSW stream “significant” is an understatement; these are the boxes that contain our cereal, soap, pasta, oatmeal, popcorn, tea, over-the-counter medicines, and adhesive bandages. They are the waxed cartons that dispense our milk and orange juice, our most expensive soups and our cheapest wines. According to a recent news article, a pilot program in Florence Township, New Jersey “managed to recycle over 2,000 pounds of cartons a month”, with an expectation of “recycling two million pounds of cartons over the course of a year” county-wide(South Jersey Local News).

     The problem with paper cartons used to be that some of them are coated with wax, and some of them contain around twenty percent plastic. This used to make them difficult, if not practically impossible to recycle, but that isn’t the case anymore. Whether or not they can be recycled now depends on a city’s capability to recycle them, so it’s understandable why Bismarck can not start recycling all paper cartons right away; however, this ought to be an issue for future deliberation on removing material from the MSW stream.

     Another source of currently non-recyclable material in the MSW stream consists of glass containers. Americans generated 12.2 million tons of glass in 2008, but only 23 percent of it was recycled. The largest contributor to all of this glass is containers – those used for soda, alcohol, and food (EPA). The real shame about this is that it costs less to recycle glass than it does to make new glass, both in terms of the energy it takes to melt down the material and the extended life of the furnaces used to do so. The less energy used means that less carbon emissions are produced, which is environmentally responsible. According to the EPA, “Ninety percent of recycled glass is used to make new containers, and the demand for quality [crushed glass] is greater than the supply.” So why doesn’t Bismarck accept glass for recycling?

     According to the North Dakota Solid Waste & Recycling Association, “[g]lass in North Dakota is generally not used to make new glass due to the distance to most glass manufacturers and the relatively low value of the commodity.” Is it possible that the value is low because the demand in North Dakota is low, and is it possible that demand is low because the supply in North Dakota is also low? It is, in fact, entirely plausible that a new supply stream of glass cullet (the crushed glass that is used to make new glass) can help bring the glassmaking industry to North Dakota, a state known for its pride in homegrown business and crafts. A high demand would mean a tidy profit to help offset the cost of collecting and processing the glass; but the real value is in the fact that recycling glass will cut down immensely on the volume of waste generated in the home.

     Another way to encourage glass recycling, not to mention recycling in general, involves “container deposit laws.” Put simply, these laws would raise the cost of a bottled beverage (most states’ bottle laws only regard carbonated beverages, i.e. soda and beer) by five or ten cents. The consumer gets this money back by returning the container to any store that sells the same product. For example, someone who buys a case of soda in Michigan must pay $2.40 (24 x 10¢) extra for deposit. For each can or bottle they return to a store, they receive the ten cents back. The manufacturer’s driver picks up the collected containers every time they deliver new product, and then the manufacturer recycles them into brand new containers, saving 40-95% of the energy it takes to make the containers from virgin materials. This process “provides a monetary incentive for the public to return their containers for recycling . . . [and] also provide an incentive to the manufacturers to encourage recycling, as they get some money [from] the bottles that are returned . . . states that have [container deposit laws] have higher recovery rates”. Take California, for example: since creating its container deposit legislation in 1986, the state has reached a bottle recycling rate of 85 percent (Fox, 52). Michigan, the state with the highest bottle deposit on carbonated beverages at ten cents, has an impressive overall redemption rate of 96.9 percent (Container Recycling Institute).

     Bottle deposit laws not only encourage recycling through a financial incentive, but they prevent litter. Instead of being thrown in the gutter, soda cans and bottles get taken back to the store; even if one does get thrown in the street, someone will come by and pick that container up just to get the nickel or dime from it. Bottle deposit laws create jobs for people who handle, sort, and process recyclable materials. They encourage consumers and beverage producers to be responsible for the waste they generate, and most of all they complement curbside recycling in the effort to cut down on the consumption of landfill space.

     It can be argued that considering the relatively small population of North Dakota compared to other states (searching for “population of North Dakota” and “population of Michigan” on Google shows that by comparison, North Dakota’s population is 6.5 percent of Michigan’s population,) the recycling program can be expected to be just as small. But to those who care about North Dakota and the sheer beauty of the landscape, recycling is a very big deal, and an acceptable way to reduce the size of our garbage dumps. Curbside recycling, along with a “pay-as-you-throw” price scale for garbage collection, is the best method currently available for reducing the volume of trash going to the landfill and making it sustainable, thereby preventing the need for an extra landfill. Examining the options for adding on more recycling capability in the future, such as glass and carton recycling, will allow Bismarck to scale to the growing population in the coming decades and to further reduce solid waste. A bottle deposit law would provide a high level of incentive for people to recycle their bottles and cans. It may take time, money, and education to get everyone on board, but there is no doubt that the time has come for public recycling programs, not just for Bismarck’s sake, but for all of North Dakota. These improvements in recycling will help the landfill by reducing the river of garbage going into it to a trickle that can be easily managed at one dump.

WORKS CITED

Associated Press. “Grand Forks curbside recycling program picks up.” The Bismarck Tribune. The Bismarck Tribune, 06 Feb. 2005. Web. 09 Dec. 2010

—. “State’s goal of reducing solid waste was not met.” The Bismarck Tribune. The Bismarck Tribune, 20 Apr. 2008. Web. 09 Dec. 2010.

Boeshans, Angela. “Recycling just plain sensible.” The Bismarck Tribune. The Bismarck Tribune, 13 Jan. 2008. Web. 09 Dec. 2010.

City of Bismarck. Recycling Trailer Map. Bismarck: City of Bismarck, 2010. Web. http://www.bismarck.org/DocumentView.aspx?DID=2434

Container Recycling Institute. “The Michigan Deposit Law.” BottleBill.org. Container Recycling Institute, 31 Jan. 2010. Web. 29 Nov. 2010. http://www.bottlebill.org/legislation/usa/michigan.htm

Eckroth, LeAnn. “Bismarck City Commission accepts survey results on trash.” The Bismarck Tribune. The Bismarck Tribune, 24 Mar. 2010. Web. 10 Nov. 2010.

—. “City officials recap ‘green’ efforts.” The Bismarck Tribune. The Bismarck Tribune, 01 Oct. 2009. Web. 09 Nov. 2010.

—. “City wants to boost recycling.” The Bismarck Tribune. The Bismarck Tribune, 07 Oct. 2009. Web. 10 Nov. 2010.

—. “Relooking at recycling.” The Bismarck Tribune. The Bismarck Tribune, 25 Nov. 2009. Web. 09 Nov. 2010.

Environmental Protection Agency. “Glass.” EPA.gov. Environmental Protection Agency, 01 Dec. 2010. Web. 02 Dec. 2010. http://www.epa.gov/wastes/conserve/materials/glass.htm

Fox, Michael. “CASH FOR Trash.” Earth Island Journal 25.1 (2010): 49-52. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 29 Nov. 2010.

North Dakota Solid Waste & Recycling Association. Glass Recycling. Bismarck: North Dakota Solid Waste & Recycling Association, 2010. Pamphlet.

South Jersey Local News. “Curbsite paper cart recycling goes county-wide.” South Jersey Local News. South Jersey Local News, 02 Dec. 2010. Web. 03 Dec. 2010. http://www.southjerseylocalnews.com/articles/2010/12/02/community_news/news/doc4cf7f57ba6fdb282004660.prt

Waste Management. “Curbside Recycling Pickup.” Wm.com. Waste Management, 2010. Web. 09 Dec. 2010. http://www.wm.com/enterprise/municipalities/residential-solutions/recycling-pickup.jsp

>The coolest iPad creation yet

>I love my iPad; I try to find ways to create content with it, not just because I’m a creative guy, but because one of my friends told me that the iPad is not a device for content creation. I love a challenge, and I love to be right. I draw and paint, I write, and I have even made slideshows. But I never thought I would see anything like the video below: three-dimensional holographic effects in video. This video gets a thumbs-up for life for style- and awe-factor.

>2010 – A year in status

>Here are a couple of “poster” images I made with the My Year in Status app on Facebook; It’s kind of funny to look back at some of the weird things I say.

2010 My year in status #1

2010 My year in status #2

>My love for commas knows no bounds . . .

>I just finished a peer review on a classmate’s paper in Comp III and had this to say about the use of commas:

The one thing I would really pick out is your sentence structure. You are a great writer, but you need to stock up on commas and use them more generously. Heck, buy them in bulk. Whenever you proofread your own work, either say it out loud or try to hear it in your mind as it would be spoken. Whenever the voice pauses, not going immediately on to the next word but stopping just for a heartbeat, ask yourself: could I put a comma here? More often than not, the answer is yes. I like to think that the comma is how we encapsulate ideas for the reader on the phrase level; it gives their brain a half-second to process what they have just read. Without the comma, it requires more effort to understand what we are reading. They can even help us writers judge the best length for each sentence.

I’m going to save that bit for future peer reviews; personally, I think the comma is a commonly underused form of punctuation in personal writing.

>Three new books, some news, and stuff:

>So here I am, whiling away some time while Karisa plays Super Paper Mario. I just downloaded the Gimp and put together some pictures of three journals I made last weekend. They’re more of the same, of course, but I like matching papers and trying to get things just right. These three have the decorative paper covers, of course, but they also have the new-and-improved cloth-reinforced hinges and 100% cotton paper pages. Because I love making books that are this awesome. I feel like they could be better, but I’m still working out some kinks. 013 came out fine, but 014 and 015 ended up with their covers overlapping the textblock so much that I worry about the ends of the binding getting accidentally cut, so I think in the future I’m going to make my covers so that they’re about flush with the textblock on the sides that are adjacent to the hinges. Okay, so enough about my stuff, here’s the pictures:

fronts 13-15

insides 13-15

Left to right, these are 013, 014, and 015.

013 is as simple as it gets with black and white paper on the cover – something elegant for the front, something writer-ish for the inside – and heavily waxed, variegated deep-red floss for the binding. I actually made the covers for 013 over a month ago, which is why they happen to be the right size. I had three textblocks set up, and one of the cover sets I made last weekend was experimental and didn’t turn out the way I wanted it to, so I’m going to give it some love before I make that book.

014 is some kind of safari look, another travelogue kind of book I suppose. The paper is actually a heaver linen texture, but the way it’s printed, it looks like large-grain leather and has huge photogenic appeal. Look at it, doesn’t that texture look real?

015 is the guitar journal. I’ve had it in my head for some time, inspired by the wooden logo that fell off of a CD-60 acoustic dreadnought case about six months ago. I held onto it just in case, but then I felt it was safe to use as an embellishment for this journal. Cool guitar paper for the front, technicolor wood bullseye for the insides. . . Karisa says that reminds her of the Who, and that’s cool with me. I want to find something else cool with it, but I refuse to go over the top with embellishment. I like to keep it simple, but I don’t want to get bored with it either.

So anyway, I’m feeling the eyestrain. I spent serious quality time with Metroid: Other M on the Wii this morning, mainly because it’s the only time I have to play video games. I beat the game, and then after the credits, Samus “forgot my phone” Aran decided to go back to the ship on which the game took place to retrieve a mysterious something, I don’t know what. I figured, hey, why not pick up the power-ups that I missed the first time through? Yeah, I couldn’t find the first three, even though they were blinking on my map right in front of my face. Then I ran into something very ugly, something I had to get past to progress, and after the twentieth time of not killing it, I got very, very angry.

I said things to the television that I have not said to it in a very, very long time. I said the “F” word more times than I can count, sometimes using two or three variations of that word in a row. I worry sometimes that the neighbors downstairs can hear me, and then I realize that they probably have their own crap to worry about. I turned the game off and gave myself some space to breathe. I defeated Queen Metroid, I’ll get this ugly dude. Next weekend. One thing at a time.

As proof of my usual good nature, here’s a picture of cats I took earlier with Retro Camera Plus for Android:

Photobucket

Niko, photogenic as ever, could be an LOL cat, but Lola is more of an FU cat. Look at that face!

Over the next two and a half Mondays and two and a half Tuesdays, I’ll be watching English teachers in action at Horizon Middle School and Mandan High School. Starting tomorrow. I have to be somewhere by eight in the morning. Bummer. On the other hand, I’m getting PTO for those days, so I get to come home and actually do homework, instead of getting it all done at the last minute, yay! I should come home and play video games. Halo. That would teach me for taking three classes in one semester. That would teach me good. I’m going to be an awesome English teacher, I know it.

>011 – The travelogue, first iteration

>Ha ha, did I say “this weekend” so long ago? That was my mistake. What I meant was, “when I was so sick of doing homework and trying to figure out my pitifully small working space while trying to keep everyone else happy”. So here it is! You’ll find the pictures after the jump, but don’t skip my awesome description, please.

011 is my first concept of a “travel journal,” or travelogue, as I like to call it. It’s a mappy, stampy, word-cloudy kind of book comprising roughly 120 pages of cotton stationery, postal-printed vellum flyleaves, and real international postage stamps on the outside covers. Very cool stuff, indeed. I neglected to cut a space out of the covers after having measured them to account for the spacing between the cover boards and the spine boards, so the cover sticks out a bit on the fore edge. I thought this would be a marvelous place to store a pen, but I haven’t really gotten around to figuring out how I’m going to accomplish that, so maybe I’ll do it and maybe I won’t.

I made it so that the owner of this book could use either cover as the front; I like to make it a matter of personal choice. Do you prefer Greece/Uruguay/Argentina/Poland/Australia/The Netherlands, or England/Germany/Denmark/Romania/The Philippines/The Netherlands? That’s a huge choice, one that says a lot about you, and I’m not going to make it for you.

011-

Photobucket Photobucket